| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Remove __assume_ctx_lock() from lock initializers.
Implicitly asserting an active context during initialization caused
false-positive double-lock errors when acquiring a lock immediately after its
initialization. Moving forward, guarded member initialization must either:
1. Use guard(type_init)(&lock) or scoped_guard(type_init, ...).
2. Use context_unsafe() for simple initialization.
Reported-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/57062131-e79e-42c2-aa0b-8f931cb8cac2@acm.org/
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260119094029.1344361-7-elver@google.com
|
|
As discussed in [1], removing __cond_lock() will improve the readability
of trylock code. Now that Sparse context tracking support has been
removed, we can also remove __cond_lock().
Change existing APIs to either drop __cond_lock() completely, or make
use of the __cond_acquires() function attribute instead.
In particular, spinlock and rwlock implementations required switching
over to inline helpers rather than statement-expressions for their
trylock_* variants.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250207082832.GU7145@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net/ [1]
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251219154418.3592607-25-elver@google.com
|
|
Add support for Clang's context analysis for raw_spinlock_t,
spinlock_t, and rwlock. This wholesale conversion is required because
all three of them are interdependent.
To avoid warnings in constructors, the initialization functions mark a
lock as acquired when initialized before guarded variables.
The test verifies that common patterns do not generate false positives.
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251219154418.3592607-9-elver@google.com
|
|
The sleeping locks on PREEMPT_RT (rt_spin_lock() and friends) lack
sparse annotation. Therefore a missing spin_unlock() won't be spotted by
sparse in a PREEMPT_RT build while it is noticed on a !PREEMPT_RT build.
Add the __acquires/__releases macros to the lock/ unlock functions. The
trylock functions already use the __cond_lock() wrapper.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240812104200.2239232-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de
|
|
In preparation for converting bit_spin_lock to rwlock in zsmalloc so
that multiple writers of zspages can run at the same time but those
zspages are supposed to be different zspage instance. Thus, it's not
deadlock. This patch adds write_lock_nested to support the case for
LOCKDEP.
[minchan@kernel.org: fix write_lock_nested for RT]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YZfrMTAXV56HFWJY@google.com
[bigeasy@linutronix.de: fixup write_lock_nested() implementation]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211123170134.y6xb7pmpgdn4m3bn@linutronix.de
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211115185909.3949505-8-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Similar to rw_semaphores, on RT the rwlock substitution is not writer fair,
because it's not feasible to have a writer inherit its priority to
multiple readers. Readers blocked on a writer follow the normal rules of
priority inheritance. Like RT spinlocks, RT rwlocks are state preserving
across the slow lock operations (contended case).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211303.882793524@linutronix.de
|
